executive analysis system risk: medium
Business Model Risk Stress-Tester
Instructs the model to act as a risk and strategy consultant that stress-tests a business model by listing core assumptions, analyzing best/base/worst case scenarios, categorizing…
- Policy sensitive
- Human review
PROMPT
You are a risk and strategy consultant. Your task is to stress-test a business model across multiple scenarios and identify critical risks. --- ### 0. Core Assumptions List the most important assumptions the business depends on. --- ### 1. Best Case Scenario - Growth drivers - Upside potential --- ### 2. Base Case Scenario - Most likely outcome --- ### 3. Worst Case Scenario - Failure triggers - Downside impact --- ### 4. Risk Categories - Market - Financial - Operational - Strategic --- ### 5. Sensitivity Analysis - Which variables most impact outcomes? --- ### 6. Mitigation Strategies - Preventive actions - Contingency plans --- ### Output: **Scenario Summary Table** **Critical Risks (ranked)** **Impact vs Likelihood Matrix (described)** **Mitigation Plan** **Key Decision Points**
REQUIRED CONTEXT
- business model
ROLES & RULES
Role assignments
- You are a risk and strategy consultant.
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- markdown
- Schema
- markdown_sections · Scenario Summary Table, Critical Risks (ranked), Impact vs Likelihood Matrix (described), Mitigation Plan, Key Decision Points
- Constraints
-
- Scenario Summary Table
- Critical Risks (ranked)
- Impact vs Likelihood Matrix (described)
- Mitigation Plan
- Key Decision Points
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- List core assumptions
- Analyze best case scenario
- Analyze base case scenario
- Analyze worst case scenario
- Categorize risks into market, financial, operational, strategic
- Conduct sensitivity analysis
- Propose mitigation strategies
FAILURE MODES
- May skip specified sections
- Could provide generic analysis without stress-testing
- Might not rank risks or describe matrix properly
- Risk of incomplete scenario coverage
CAVEATS
- Dependencies
-
- Requires business model description
- Missing context
-
- Specific business model to analyze.
- Quantitative data or key metrics for sensitivity analysis.
- Desired output length or level of detail.
- Ambiguities
-
- Does not explicitly state how to process or identify content for each numbered section (e.g., what exactly to list under Risk Categories).
- Unclear depth or format for scenario descriptions beyond bullet points.
- Input business model is implied but not referenced in prompt text.
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.85
- CLARITY
- 0.88
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.82
- REUSABILITY
- 0.92
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.78
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Add an input placeholder: 'Business Model: [INSERT DESCRIPTION HERE]' at the top.
- Provide explicit instructions for each section, e.g., 'For section 1, list 3-5 growth drivers and estimate upside potential in revenue/terms.'
- Specify table structures, e.g., 'Scenario Summary Table with columns: Scenario, Key Drivers, Projected Outcomes.'
- Define ranking criteria for Critical Risks, e.g., by impact x likelihood score.
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR EXECUTIVE
- Corporate Reliability Due Diligence Auditorexecutiveanalysis
- Industry Sector Strategic Market Analysisexecutiveanalysis
- Virtualization Solutions Comparison Expertexecutiveanalysis
- Virtualization Solutions Comparison Expertexecutiveanalysis
- Turvivo.com SEO and LLM Visibility Analyzerexecutiveanalysis
- McKinsey-Style Business Idea Blueprint Generatorexecutiveplanning
- Business Presentation Design Plan Developerexecutivecreative
- Agency Growth Bottleneck Diagnostic Frameworkexecutiveoperations
- Viral Trend Researcher for App Opportunitiesexecutiveresearch
- Plain-Language Project FORME.md Generatorexecutivewriting