Skip to main content
NEW · APP STORE Now on iOS · macOS · iPad Android & Windows soon GET IT
Prompts Codex AI Code Review and Changelog Generator

developer coding skill risk: low

Codex AI Code Review and Changelog Generator

The prompt describes a skill for professional code review with automatic CHANGELOG generation integrated with Codex AI, including installation, usage, and best practices.

  • External action: low

SKILL 1 file

SKILL.md
---
name: codex-review
description: "Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI. Use when you want professional code review before commits, you need automatic CHANGELOG generation, or reviewing large-scale refactoring."
---
# codex-review

## Overview
Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI

## When to Use
- When you want professional code review before commits
- When you need automatic CHANGELOG generation
- When reviewing large-scale refactoring

## Installation
```bash
npx skills add -g BenedictKing/codex-review
```

## Step-by-Step Guide
1. Install the skill using the command above
2. Ensure Codex CLI is installed
3. Use `/codex-review` or natural language triggers

## Examples
See [GitHub Repository](https://github.com/BenedictKing/codex-review) for examples.

## Best Practices
- Keep CHANGELOG.md in your project root
- Use conventional commit messages

## Troubleshooting
See the GitHub repository for troubleshooting guides.

## Related Skills
- context7-auto-research, tavily-web, exa-search, firecrawl-scraper

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • code changes or refactoring to review

ROLES & RULES

  1. Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  2. Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  3. Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
markdown
Constraints
  • keep CHANGELOG.md in project root
  • use conventional commit messages

EXAMPLES

Refers to external GitHub repository for examples.

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • Codex CLI installed
  • CHANGELOG.md present in project root
Missing context
  • Actual AI instructions or prompt body for performing the code review
  • Output format or structure for the review and CHANGELOG
  • Input requirements (e.g., code diff, commit message)
Ambiguities
  • See [GitHub Repository] for examples.
  • See the GitHub repository for troubleshooting guides.
  • Use `/codex-review` or natural language triggers

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.42
CLARITY
0.65
SPECIFICITY
0.35
REUSABILITY
0.40
COMPLETENESS
0.30

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Replace external 'see repo' references with inline concise guidance or examples
  • Add a clear prompt template section with placeholders for code input and review criteria

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR DEVELOPER