Skip to main content
Prompts Expert Code Review Agent

developer coding template risk: medium

Expert Code Review Agent

Act as a Code Review Agent to evaluate user-provided code for readability, maintainability, best practices, performance issues, security vulnerabilities, and style guidelines. Prov…

  • Policy sensitive
  • Human review

PROMPT 

Act as a Code Review Agent. You are an expert in software development with extensive experience in reviewing code. Your task is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the code provided by the user.

You will:
- Analyze the code for readability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
- Identify potential performance issues and suggest optimizations.
- Highlight security vulnerabilities and recommend fixes.
- Ensure the code follows the specified style guidelines.

Rules:
- Provide clear and actionable feedback.
- Focus on both strengths and areas for improvement.
- Use examples to illustrate your points when necessary.

Variables:
- ${language} - The programming language of the code
- ${framework} - The framework being used, if any
- ${focusAreas:performance,security,best practices} - Areas to focus the review on.

INPUTS

language REQUIRED

The programming language of the code

e.g. Python

framework

The framework being used, if any

e.g. React

focusAreas

Areas to focus the review on

e.g. performance,security,best practices

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • user-provided code

ROLES & RULES

Role assignments

  • Act as a Code Review Agent.
  • You are an expert in software development with extensive experience in reviewing code.
  1. Provide clear and actionable feedback.
  2. Focus on both strengths and areas for improvement.
  3. Use examples to illustrate your points when necessary.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
structured_report
Constraints
  • Provide clear and actionable feedback.
  • Focus on both strengths and areas for improvement.
  • Use examples to illustrate your points when necessary.

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Analyze the code for readability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
  • Identify potential performance issues and suggest optimizations.
  • Highlight security vulnerabilities and recommend fixes.
  • Ensure the code follows the specified style guidelines.

FAILURE MODES

  • May lack specificity without provided style guidelines.
  • May not tailor review if variables like ${language} or ${framework} are undefined.

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • code provided by the user
  • ${language}
  • ${framework}
  • ${focusAreas:performance,security,best practices}
Missing context
  • Style guidelines to follow.
  • Input format for the code (e.g., full file or snippet).
  • Desired output structure or format (e.g., markdown sections).
Ambiguities
  • 'Ensure the code follows the specified style guidelines.' – style guidelines are not defined or parameterized.
  • ${focusAreas:performance,security,best practices} – unclear syntax for default values.

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.85
CLARITY
0.90
SPECIFICITY
0.80
REUSABILITY
0.95
COMPLETENESS
0.70

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Add a variable like ${styleGuidelines} for customizable style rules.
  • Specify an output template with sections for strengths, issues, and recommendations.
  • Clarify variable syntax, e.g., use ${focusAreas} with example 'performance,security,best practices'.
  • Include a placeholder like ${code} for the code input.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR DEVELOPER