Skip to main content
Prompts Multi-Domain Critical Thinking Analyzer

model analysis template risk: low

Multi-Domain Critical Thinking Analyzer

Instructs the model to analyze a given topic, question, or situation using a critical thinking framework (clarify issue, identify conclusion, reasons, assumptions, evidence, altern…

PROMPT

> **Task:** Analyze the given topic, question, or situation by applying the critical thinking framework (clarify issue, identify conclusion, reasons, assumptions, evidence, alternatives, etc.). Simultaneously, use **parallel thinking** to explore the topic across multiple domains (such as philosophy, science, history, art, psychology, technology, and culture).
>
> **Format:**
> 1. **Issue Clarification:** What is the core question or issue?
> 2. **Conclusion Identification:** What is the main conclusion being proposed?
> 3. **Reason Analysis:** What reasons are offered to support the conclusion?
> 4. **Assumption Detection:** What hidden assumptions underlie the argument?
> 5. **Evidence Evaluation:** How strong, relevant, and sufficient is the evidence?
> 6. **Alternative Perspectives:** What alternative views exist, and what reasoning supports them?
> 7. **Parallel Thinking Across Domains:**
>    - *Philosophy*: How does this issue relate to philosophical principles or dilemmas?
>    - *Science*: What scientific theories or data are relevant?
>    - *History*: How has this issue evolved over time?
>    - *Art*: How might artists or creative minds interpret this issue?
>    - *Psychology*: What mental models, biases, or behaviors are involved?
>    - *Technology*: How does tech impact or interact with this issue?
>    - *Culture*: How do different cultures view or handle this issue?
> 8. **Synthesis:** Integrate the analysis into a cohesive, multi-domain insight.
> 9. **Questions for Further Inquiry:** Propose follow-up questions that could deepen the exploration.

- **Generate an example using this prompt on the topic of misinformation mitigation.**

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • topic, question, or situation

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
markdown
Schema
markdown_sections · Issue Clarification, Conclusion Identification, Reason Analysis, Assumption Detection, Evidence Evaluation, Alternative Perspectives, Parallel Thinking Across Domains, Synthesis, Questions for Further Inquiry
Constraints
  • Use exact 9 numbered sections
  • Include all specified parallel domains in section 7
  • End with questions for further inquiry

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Analyze using critical thinking framework
  • Apply parallel thinking across multiple domains
  • Follow the specified 9-point format

FAILURE MODES

  • May skip sections of the format
  • Incomplete exploration of all specified domains
  • Lack of multi-domain synthesis

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • Given topic, question, or situation to analyze
Missing context
  • Desired depth or length for each section
  • Tone or style for the analysis (e.g., formal, concise)

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.88
CLARITY
0.95
SPECIFICITY
0.95
REUSABILITY
0.70
COMPLETENESS
0.95

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Use a placeholder like '{topic}' instead of hardcoding 'misinformation mitigation' to make it a reusable template.
  • Add guidelines on handling cases where certain domains are irrelevant to avoid forced content.
  • Specify if the output should be concise or expansive.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR MODEL