model analysis template risk: low
Multi-Domain Critical Thinking Analyzer
Instructs the model to analyze a given topic, question, or situation using a critical thinking framework (clarify issue, identify conclusion, reasons, assumptions, evidence, altern…
PROMPT
> **Task:** Analyze the given topic, question, or situation by applying the critical thinking framework (clarify issue, identify conclusion, reasons, assumptions, evidence, alternatives, etc.). Simultaneously, use **parallel thinking** to explore the topic across multiple domains (such as philosophy, science, history, art, psychology, technology, and culture). > > **Format:** > 1. **Issue Clarification:** What is the core question or issue? > 2. **Conclusion Identification:** What is the main conclusion being proposed? > 3. **Reason Analysis:** What reasons are offered to support the conclusion? > 4. **Assumption Detection:** What hidden assumptions underlie the argument? > 5. **Evidence Evaluation:** How strong, relevant, and sufficient is the evidence? > 6. **Alternative Perspectives:** What alternative views exist, and what reasoning supports them? > 7. **Parallel Thinking Across Domains:** > - *Philosophy*: How does this issue relate to philosophical principles or dilemmas? > - *Science*: What scientific theories or data are relevant? > - *History*: How has this issue evolved over time? > - *Art*: How might artists or creative minds interpret this issue? > - *Psychology*: What mental models, biases, or behaviors are involved? > - *Technology*: How does tech impact or interact with this issue? > - *Culture*: How do different cultures view or handle this issue? > 8. **Synthesis:** Integrate the analysis into a cohesive, multi-domain insight. > 9. **Questions for Further Inquiry:** Propose follow-up questions that could deepen the exploration. - **Generate an example using this prompt on the topic of misinformation mitigation.**
REQUIRED CONTEXT
- topic, question, or situation
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- markdown
- Schema
- markdown_sections · Issue Clarification, Conclusion Identification, Reason Analysis, Assumption Detection, Evidence Evaluation, Alternative Perspectives, Parallel Thinking Across Domains, Synthesis, Questions for Further Inquiry
- Constraints
-
- Use exact 9 numbered sections
- Include all specified parallel domains in section 7
- End with questions for further inquiry
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- Analyze using critical thinking framework
- Apply parallel thinking across multiple domains
- Follow the specified 9-point format
FAILURE MODES
- May skip sections of the format
- Incomplete exploration of all specified domains
- Lack of multi-domain synthesis
CAVEATS
- Dependencies
-
- Given topic, question, or situation to analyze
- Missing context
-
- Desired depth or length for each section
- Tone or style for the analysis (e.g., formal, concise)
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.88
- CLARITY
- 0.95
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.95
- REUSABILITY
- 0.70
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.95
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Use a placeholder like '{topic}' instead of hardcoding 'misinformation mitigation' to make it a reusable template.
- Add guidelines on handling cases where certain domains are irrelevant to avoid forced content.
- Specify if the output should be concise or expansive.
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR MODEL
- Travel Website SEO UX CRO Auditormodelanalysis
- Multi-Dimensional 5 Whys Root Cause Guidemodelanalysis
- Lazy AI Email Detectormodelanalysis
- Visual Media Cinematic Forensics Analyzermodelanalysis
- AI Computer Vision Algorithm Analyzermodelanalysis
- Comprehensive Repository Bug Audit and Fixermodelanalysis
- Codebase Pattern Skill File Generatormodelanalysis
- DeepThinker-CA Recursive Thinking Analyzermodelanalysis
- Unified Image Style Extractormodelanalysis
- Bug Risk Analyst for Code Changesmodelanalysis