agent operations skill risk: low
Conductor Project Artifacts Validator
Provides shell commands to verify the conductor directory, tracks, and required markdown files, plus usage rules, status marker patterns for tracks.md and plan.md, track ID format,…
SKILL 1 file
SKILL.md
--- name: conductor-validator description: "Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness," --- # Check if conductor directory exists ls -la conductor/ # Find all track directories ls -la conductor/tracks/ # Check for required files ls conductor/index.md conductor/product.md conductor/tech-stack.md conductor/workflow.md conductor/tracks.md ``` ## Use this skill when - Working on check if conductor directory exists tasks or workflows - Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for check if conductor directory exists ## Do not use this skill when - The task is unrelated to check if conductor directory exists - You need a different domain or tool outside this scope ## Instructions - Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs. - Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes. - Provide actionable steps and verification. - If detailed examples are required, open `resources/implementation-playbook.md`. ## Pattern Matching **Status markers in tracks.md:** ``` - [ ] Track Name # Not started - [~] Track Name # In progress - [x] Track Name # Complete ``` **Task markers in plan.md:** ``` - [ ] Task description # Pending - [~] Task description # In progress - [x] Task description # Complete ``` **Track ID pattern:** ``` <type>_<name>_<YYYYMMDD> Example: feature_user_auth_20250115 ``` ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
REQUIRED CONTEXT
- conductor directory
- track directories
- required files (index.md, product.md, tech-stack.md, workflow.md, tracks.md)
ROLES & RULES
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the task is unrelated to check if conductor directory exists
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- plain_text
- Constraints
-
- clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs first
- apply best practices and validate outcomes
- provide actionable steps and verification
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
FAILURE MODES
- May be used outside its intended scope.
- Output may be treated as substitute for validation.
EXAMPLES
Includes examples of status markers in tracks.md, task markers in plan.md, and Track ID pattern.
CAVEATS
- Dependencies
-
- Requires resources/implementation-playbook.md if detailed examples needed.
- Missing context
-
- Expected output format or report structure
- Success/failure criteria for validation
- How to handle or report missing files/directories
- Ambiguities
-
- Description sentence is truncated after 'completeness,'
- 'Use this skill when' and 'Do not use this skill when' sections repeat the placeholder phrase 'check if conductor directory exists'
- No definition of what 'completeness' means for the artifacts
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.28
- CLARITY
- 0.35
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.25
- REUSABILITY
- 0.20
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.30
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Finish the truncated description and replace all placeholder 'check if conductor directory exists' text with the actual intended task scope
- Add an explicit 'Output' section specifying the required validation report format
- Define concrete completeness rules instead of generic instructions like 'Apply relevant best practices'
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR AGENT
- Local Documentation Online Sync Automator agent operations
- HashiCorp Packer Golden Image Expert agent operations
- ML Experiment GPU Deployment Workflow agent operations
- Codex Training Metrics Monitor agent operations
- Context Optimization Techniques Guide agent operations
- Issue Triage State Machine agent operations
- ML Experiment Results Monitor agent operations
- DOCX Document Creation Editing Guide agent operations
- Repo Agent Skills Configuration Setup agent operations
- Git Worktree Isolated Workspace Setup agent operations
- Agent Context Compression Strategies agent operations
- Parallel Agent Dispatcher for Independent Tasks agent operations
- Scientific Computing Resource Detector agent operations
- PPTX File Handling Skill Guide agent operations
- Interactive QA GitHub Issue Filer agent operations
- Sprint Retrospective Facilitator agent operations
- Agent Skill Writing Guide agent operations
- Brilliant Directories Rube MCP Automation Guide agent operations
- Istio Linkerd Service Mesh Expert agent operations
- Machine Learning Experiment Monitor agent operations
- Benchling Python SDK Integration agent operations
- Blackbaud Automation via Rube MCP agent operations
- DigitalOcean Automation via Rube MCP agent operations
- Service Mesh Architecture Expert agent operations
- WandB Training Metrics Health Checker agent operations