general user evaluation user risk: low

Investor and Competitor Idea Critic

Instructs the model to act as an investor deciding whether to fund the user's idea and as a competitor trying to destroy the idea.

PROMPT

. Act as an investor who’s deciding where to fund me.”

- “Pretend you’re a competitor trying to destroy my idea.

REQUIRED CONTEXT

user's idea or pitch

ROLES & RULES

Role assignments

Act as an investor who’s deciding where to fund me.
Pretend you’re a competitor trying to destroy my idea.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format: plain_text

CAVEATS

Missing context

Description of the business idea or pitch to evaluate.
Expected output format or structure (e.g., decision, critique).
Criteria for investor funding decision or competitor attacks.

Ambiguities

Prompt appears fragmented with leading period and incomplete bullet point.
Unclear if these are separate prompts or parts of one instruction.
No context for 'my idea' or what actions to take beyond role assumption.

QUALITY

OVERALL: 0.20
CLARITY: 0.30
SPECIFICITY: 0.20
REUSABILITY: 0.40
COMPLETENESS: 0.10

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

Combine into a clear multi-role prompt: 'Evaluate [IDEA] from two perspectives: 1. As an investor deciding to fund it. 2. As a competitor trying to destroy it.'
Add placeholders like [IDEA] for reusability.
Specify output format: 'For each role, list 3 pros/cons and a final recommendation.'

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.