Skip to main content
Prompts Universal Job Fit Evaluator

general user hr template risk: low

Universal Job Fit Evaluator

Analyzes a job posting against candidate priorities, skills, experience, portfolio, and anchor skills to compute weighted match percentages for responsibilities, qualifications, sk…

  • External action: medium

PROMPT

# Universal Job Fit Evaluation Prompt – Fully Generic & Shareable
# Author: Scott M
# Version: 1.6
# Last Modified: 2026-03-06

## Changelog
- **v1.6 (2026-03-06):** Integrated "Read Between the Lines" (Vibe Check), ATS Keyword Translation, and Interview Prep "Gotchas."
- **v1.5 (2026-03-04):** Added "User Action Advice" for blocked URLs. Restored visible author headers.
- **v1.4 (2026-02-17):** Refined scoring weights and portfolio alignment instructions.
- **v1.3 (2026-02-04):** Added Anchor Skill list and confidence levels.

## Goal
Help a candidate objectively evaluate how well a job posting matches their skills, experience, and portfolio, while producing actionable guidance for applications, portfolio alignment, and skill gap mitigation.

---

## Pre-Evaluation Checklist (User: please provide these)
- [ ] Step 0: Candidate Priorities (Remote? Salary? Tech stack?)
- [ ] Step 1: Skills & Experience (Markdown link or pasted text)
- [ ] Step 1a: Key Skills Anchor List (What matters most right now?)
- [ ] Step 2: Portfolio links/descriptions
- [ ] Job Posting: URL or full text

---

## Step 0: Candidate Priorities
- Roles/Domains:
- Location preference (remote / hybrid / city / region):
- Compensation expectations or constraints:
- Non-negotiables (e.g., on-call, travel, clearance, tech stack):
- Nice-to-haves:

---

## Step 1 & 1a: Skills, Experience, & Focus Areas
---

## Step 2: Portfolio / Work Samples
---

## URL Access & Fallback Protocol

**If a provided URL is broken, empty, or blocked by a paywall/login:**
1. **Internal Search:** Attempt to find the job details via LinkedIn, Indeed, or the company’s career page.
2. **Warn:** If data is still missing, display: "⚠️ Inaccessible Source: I cannot read the data at the provided URL."
3. **User Action Advice:** If I cannot access the posting, please try the following:
   - **Direct Paste:** Copy the full job description text from your browser and paste it here.
   - **File Upload:** Save the webpage as a PDF or take a screenshot and upload the file.
   - **Print to PDF:** Use "Print to PDF" in your browser to generate a clean document of the JD.

---

## Task: Job Fit Evaluation

Analyze the **Job Posting** against the **Candidate Info** provided above.

### Scoring Instructions
For each section, assign a percentage match. Use semantic alignment, not just keyword matching.

**Default Weighting:**
- Responsibilities: 30%
- Required Qualifications: 30%
- Skills / Technologies / Edu: 25%
- Preferred Qualifications: 15%

### Specific Analysis Requirements
1. **Read Between the Lines:** Identify "hidden" requirements or red flags (e.g., signs of burnout culture, vague scope, or unstated seniority).
2. **ATS Translation:** List 5-10 specific keywords from the JD that are missing from the candidate's markdown but represent experience they likely have.
3. **Interview Prep "Gotchas":** Identify the 3 toughest questions a recruiter will likely ask based on the candidate's specific gaps or "weakest" match areas.

---

## Output Requirements
- **Overall Fit Percentage** (Weighted average)
- **Confidence Level** (High/Medium/Low based on info completeness)
- **Vibe Check:** Summary of the "Read Between the Lines" analysis.
- **Top 3 Alignments:** Specific areas where the candidate is a perfect match.
- **Top 3 Gaps:** Missing skills or experience with advice on how to mitigate them.
- **Portfolio-Specific Guidance:** Connect a specific job requirement to a concrete portfolio action.
- **Additional Commentary:** Flag location, salary, or culture mismatches.

---

### Final Summary Table (Use This Exact Format)

| Section | Match % | Key Alignments & Gaps | Confidence |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Responsibilities | XX% | | |
| Required Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Preferred Qualifications | XX% | | |
| Skills / Technologies / Edu | XX% | | |
| **Overall Fit** | **XX%** | | **High/Med/Low** |

---

## Job Posting Source

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • Candidate Priorities
  • Skills & Experience
  • Key Skills Anchor List
  • Portfolio links/descriptions
  • Job Posting URL or full text

TOOLS REQUIRED

  • web_search

ROLES & RULES

  1. Analyze the Job Posting against the Candidate Info provided above.
  2. Assign a percentage match for each section using semantic alignment, not just keyword matching.
  3. Use default weighting: Responsibilities 30%, Required Qualifications 30%, Skills / Technologies / Edu 25%, Preferred Qualifications 15%.
  4. Identify hidden requirements or red flags.
  5. List 5-10 specific keywords from the JD that are missing from the candidate's markdown.
  6. Identify the 3 toughest interview questions based on gaps.
  7. Output Overall Fit Percentage as weighted average.
  8. Output Confidence Level (High/Medium/Low).
  9. Output Vibe Check summary.
  10. Output Top 3 Alignments.
  11. Output Top 3 Gaps with mitigation advice.
  12. Output Portfolio-Specific Guidance.
  13. Output Additional Commentary on mismatches.
  14. Use the exact Final Summary Table format.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
markdown
Schema
table · Section, Match %, Key Alignments & Gaps, Confidence
Constraints
  • Use exact Final Summary Table format
  • Include Overall Fit Percentage
  • Confidence Level (High/Medium/Low)
  • Top 3 Alignments
  • Top 3 Gaps
  • Portfolio-Specific Guidance
  • Vibe Check
  • ATS Keywords
  • Interview Prep Gotchas

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Calculate weighted overall fit percentage
  • Provide top 3 alignments and gaps
  • Connect job requirements to portfolio actions
  • Identify interview gotchas
  • Flag location, salary, or culture mismatches

FAILURE MODES

  • Inaccurate analysis if candidate info incomplete
  • Poor URL access handling leading to missing job details
  • Over-reliance on keywords instead of semantic alignment

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • Candidate Priorities
  • Skills & Experience (Markdown link or pasted text)
  • Key Skills Anchor List
  • Portfolio links/descriptions
  • Job Posting URL or full text
Missing context
  • Filled candidate priorities (Step 0)
  • Candidate skills, experience, and key anchor list (Steps 1 & 1a)
  • Portfolio links or descriptions (Step 2)
  • Job posting URL or full text

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.92
CLARITY
0.92
SPECIFICITY
0.95
REUSABILITY
0.95
COMPLETENESS
0.88

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Add explicit templated placeholders (e.g., {{CANDIDATE_SKILLS}}) for machine-readable reuse.
  • Define precise criteria for Confidence Level (e.g., High: all sections complete; Medium: major sections missing).
  • Include a small example of a filled Final Summary Table to illustrate usage.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR GENERAL USER