security analyst security skill risk: medium
Shadow IT Cloud Usage Detector
The prompt defines a procedure to detect unauthorized SaaS and cloud services by parsing proxy logs, DNS query logs, and netflow data, classifying domains, aggregating traffic volu…
SKILL 4 files · 2 folders
SKILL.md
--- name: detecting-shadow-it-cloud-usage description: "Detect unauthorized SaaS and cloud service usage (shadow IT) by analyzing proxy logs, DNS query logs, and netflow" --- # Detecting Shadow IT Cloud Usage ## Overview Shadow IT refers to unauthorized SaaS applications and cloud services used without IT approval. This skill analyzes proxy logs, DNS query logs, and firewall/netflow data to identify unauthorized cloud service usage, classify discovered domains against known SaaS categories, measure data transfer volumes, and flag high-risk services based on security posture and compliance requirements. ## When to Use - When investigating security incidents that require detecting shadow it cloud usage - When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain - When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type - When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques ## Prerequisites - Python 3.9+ with `pandas`, `tldextract` - Proxy logs (Squid, Zscaler, or Palo Alto format) or DNS query logs - SaaS application catalog/blocklist for classification - Network firewall logs with FQDN resolution (optional) ## Steps 1. Parse proxy access logs and extract destination domains with traffic volumes 2. Parse DNS query logs to identify resolved cloud service domains 3. Aggregate traffic by domain using pandas — total bytes, request counts, unique users 4. Classify domains against known SaaS categories (storage, email, dev tools, AI) 5. Flag unauthorized services not on the approved application list 6. Calculate risk scores based on data volume, user count, and service category 7. Generate shadow IT discovery report with remediation recommendations ## Expected Output - JSON report listing discovered cloud services with traffic volumes, user counts, risk scores, and approval status - Top unauthorized services ranked by data exfiltration risk
REQUIRED CONTEXT
- proxy logs
- DNS query logs
- SaaS application catalog/blocklist
OPTIONAL CONTEXT
- network firewall logs with FQDN resolution
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- json
- Schema
- json · discovered cloud services with traffic volumes, user counts, risk scores, and approval status, Top unauthorized services ranked by data exfiltration risk
- Constraints
- list discovered cloud services with traffic volumes, user counts, risk scores, and approval status
- rank top unauthorized services by data exfiltration risk
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- Generate shadow IT discovery report with remediation recommendations
CAVEATS
- Dependencies
- Python 3.9+ with `pandas`, `tldextract`
- Proxy logs (Squid, Zscaler, or Palo Alto format) or DNS query logs
- SaaS application catalog/blocklist for classification
- Network firewall logs with FQDN resolution (optional)
- Missing context
- Exact schema or fields for the JSON report
- Format and sample entries for the SaaS application catalog/blocklist
- Ambiguities
- Risk score calculation method (data volume, user count, category) is not detailed.
- Exact classification rules or matching logic against SaaS categories not specified.
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.78
- CLARITY
- 0.90
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.70
- REUSABILITY
- 0.80
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.75
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Add a subsection under Steps or Expected Output that defines the risk scoring formula and weights.
- Include one concrete example of each supported log format (Squid, Zscaler, DNS) in the Prerequisites section.
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR SECURITY ANALYST
- Ransomware Network Indicators Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- APT TTP Mapping with MITRE Navigatorsecurity analystsecurity
- Linux Persistence Mechanisms Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Azure AD Lateral Movement KQL Detectorsecurity analystsecurity
- Kerberos Golden Ticket Forgery Detectorsecurity analystsecurity
- LOLBAS Abuse Detection with Sigma Rulessecurity analystsecurity
- Registry Run Key Persistence Detection Guidesecurity analystsecurity
- Detect Risky OAuth Consent Grants in Entra IDsecurity analystsecurity
- Windows Service Installation Threat Huntersecurity analystsecurity
- Web Server Log Intrusion Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- RDP Brute Force Event Log Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Rekall Memory Forensics Artifact Extractorsecurity analystsecurity
- Azure Activity Logs Threat Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Scapy Network Packet Analysis Guidesecurity analystsecurity
- TLS Certificate Transparency Log Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Cobalt Strike Malleable C2 Profile Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Email Account Compromise Detection Proceduressecurity analystsecurity
- Credential Stuffing Auth Log Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- MISP Threat Intelligence Sharing with PyMISPsecurity analystsecurity
- MISP Threat Landscape Analysis Guidesecurity analystsecurity
- Malicious Scheduled Task Sysmon Detectorsecurity analystsecurity
- Kerberos Pass-the-Ticket Attack Detectorsecurity analystsecurity
- NTLM Relay Attack Event Log Analyzersecurity analystsecurity
- Linux Memory Forensics with LiME and Volatilitysecurity analystsecurity
- Insider Data Exfiltration DLP Analyzersecurity analystsecurity