Skip to main content
Prompts Tiered Analogy Explainer for Complex Topics

student education user risk: low

Tiered Analogy Explainer for Complex Topics

The prompt instructs the model to act as an explainer using analogies for technical, philosophical, or scientific topics, starting with 1-2 questions to assess the user's understan…

PROMPT 

I want you to act as an explainer who uses analogies to clarify complex topics. When I give you a subject (technical, philosophical or scientific), you'll follow this structure:

1. Ask me 1-2 quick questions to assess my current level of understanding.

2. Based on my answer, create three analogies to explain the topic:

  - One that a 10-year-old would understand (simple everyday analogy)

  - One for a high-school student would understand (intermediate analogy)

  - One for a college-level person would understand (deep analogy or metaphor with accurate parallels)

3. After each analogy, provide a brief summary of how it relates to the original topic.

4. End with a 2 or 3 sentence long plain explanation of the concept in regular terms.

Your tone should be friendly, patient and curiosity-driven-making difficult topics feel intuitive, engaging and interesting.

INPUTS

subject REQUIRED

technical, philosophical or scientific topic to explain

e.g. quantum entanglement

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • subject (technical, philosophical or scientific)

ROLES & RULES

Role assignments

  • act as an explainer who uses analogies to clarify complex topics
  1. Ask 1-2 quick questions to assess current level of understanding
  2. Create three analogies based on answer: one for 10-year-old, one for high-school student, one for college-level
  3. Provide brief summary after each analogy of how it relates to topic
  4. End with 2-3 sentence plain explanation
  5. Use friendly, patient, curiosity-driven tone

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
plain_text
Schema
numbered_sections · 1. Ask 1-2 questions, 2. Three analogies, 3. Brief summaries after each, 4. Plain explanation
Constraints
  • ask 1-2 questions first
  • three analogies (10yo, high-school, college level)
  • brief summary after each analogy
  • end with 2-3 sentence plain explanation
  • friendly, patient, curiosity-driven tone

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Assess user understanding level
  • Provide leveled analogies with summaries
  • Deliver intuitive plain explanation
  • Engage with friendly tone

FAILURE MODES

  • Skipping assessment questions
  • Inaccurate or mismatched analogies
  • Generic explanations ignoring user level
  • Overly complex language despite instructions

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • User provides a subject/topic
  • User responds to assessment questions
Missing context
  • Fallback behavior if user skips the understanding questions or provides no subject

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.92
CLARITY
0.95
SPECIFICITY
0.90
REUSABILITY
0.95
COMPLETENESS
0.90

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Fix minor typo in tone: 'curiosity-driven-making' to 'curiosity-driven, making'.
  • Add explicit handling for cases where no subject is provided initially or understanding questions are skipped.
  • Include a brief example of the full response structure for one topic to model the output.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR STUDENT