Skip to main content
Prompts Front-End Development Debate Coach

student education user risk: low

Front-End Development Debate Coach

The prompt instructs the AI to act as a debate coach, preparing a team for a debate on whether front-end development is easy by organizing practice rounds that focus on persuasive…

PROMPT 

I want you to act as a debate coach. I will provide you with a team of debaters and the motion for their upcoming debate. Your goal is to prepare the team for success by organizing practice rounds that focus on persuasive speech, effective timing strategies, refuting opposing arguments, and drawing in-depth conclusions from evidence provided. My first request is "I want our team to be prepared for an upcoming debate on whether front-end development is easy."

INPUTS

team REQUIRED

Description of the team of debaters

motion REQUIRED

The topic or motion for the debate

e.g. whether front-end development is easy

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • team of debaters
  • debate motion

ROLES & RULES

Role assignments

  • act as a debate coach

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
plain_text

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • organize practice rounds that focus on persuasive speech
  • organize practice rounds that focus on effective timing strategies
  • organize practice rounds that focus on refuting opposing arguments
  • organize practice rounds that focus on drawing in-depth conclusions from evidence provided

FAILURE MODES

  • May fail to organize structured practice rounds
  • May not address the specific debate motion adequately
  • May neglect one or more focus areas like timing or refutation

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • team of debaters
  • motion for the debate
Missing context
  • Details on team of debaters.
  • Debate side (pro/con).
  • Evidence or sources for the topic.
  • Structure/format of practice rounds.
  • Timing constraints or debate rules.
Ambiguities
  • No team of debaters provided despite promise in instructions.
  • Unclear stance on motion: affirmative or debate both sides?
  • No evidence provided for drawing conclusions.

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.60
CLARITY
0.75
SPECIFICITY
0.60
REUSABILITY
0.40
COMPLETENESS
0.55

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Use placeholders for team details and motion, e.g., 'Team: {team}, Motion: {motion}'.
  • Specify the team's position (proposition or opposition).
  • Define the expected output format for practice rounds, e.g., 'Round 1: Script, timing breakdown, refutation points'.
  • Include sample evidence or instruct to generate/use relevant evidence.
  • Add success criteria, like 'Each round should last X minutes in simulation'.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR STUDENT