agent product skill risk: low
Prioritization Frameworks Reference Guide
Provides formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates for nine prioritization frameworks including Opportunity Score, ICE, RICE, Kano, and MoSCoW.
SKILL 1 file
SKILL.md
--- name: prioritization-frameworks description: "Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work." --- ## Prioritization Frameworks Reference A reference guide to help you select and apply the right prioritization framework for your context. ### Core Principle Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize **problems (opportunities)**, not features. ### Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen, *The Lean Product Playbook*) The recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems. Survey customers on **Importance** and **Satisfaction** for each need (normalize to 0–1 scale). Three related formulas: - **Current value** = Importance × Satisfaction - **Opportunity Score** = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction) - **Customer value created** = Importance × (S2 − S1), where S1 = satisfaction before, S2 = satisfaction after High Importance + low Satisfaction = highest Opportunity Score = best opportunities. Plot on an Importance vs Satisfaction chart — upper-left quadrant is the sweet spot. Prioritizes customer problems, not solutions. ### ICE Framework Useful for prioritizing initiatives and ideas. Considers not only value but also risk and economic factors. - **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score × Number of Customers affected - **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (1-10). Accounts for risk. - **E** (Ease) = How easy is it to implement? (1-10). Accounts for economic factors. **Score** = I × C × E. Higher = prioritize first. ### RICE Framework Splits ICE's Impact into two separate factors. Useful for larger teams that need more granularity. - **R** (Reach) = Number of customers affected - **I** (Impact) = Opportunity Score (value per customer) - **C** (Confidence) = How confident are we? (0-100%) - **E** (Effort) = How much effort to implement? (person-months) **Score** = (R × I × C) / E ### 9 Frameworks Overview | Framework | Best For | Key Insight | |-----------|----------|-------------| | Eisenhower Matrix | Personal tasks | Urgent vs Important — for individual PM task management | | Impact vs Effort | Tasks/initiatives | Simple 2×2 — quick triage, not rigorous for strategic decisions | | Risk vs Reward | Initiatives | Like Impact vs Effort but accounts for uncertainty | | **Opportunity Score** | Customer problems | **Recommended.** Importance × (1 − Satisfaction). Normalize to 0–1. | | Kano Model | Understanding expectations | Must-be, Performance, Attractive, Indifferent, Reverse. For understanding, not prioritizing. | | Weighted Decision Matrix | Multi-factor decisions | Assign weights to criteria, score each option. Useful for stakeholder buy-in. | | **ICE** | Ideas/initiatives | Impact × Confidence × Ease. Recommended for quick prioritization. | | **RICE** | Ideas at scale | (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort. Adds Reach to ICE. | | MoSCoW | Requirements | Must/Should/Could/Won't. Caution: project management origin. | ### Templates - [Opportunity Score intro (PDF)](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ENbYPmk1i1AKO7UnfyTuULL5GucTVufW/view) - [Importance vs Satisfaction Template — Dan Olsen (Google Slides)](https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jg-LuF_3QHsf6f1nE1f98i4C0aulnRNMOO1jftgti8M/edit#slide=id.g796641d975_0_3) - [ICE Template (Google Sheets)](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LUfnsPolhZgm7X2oij-7EUe0CJT-Dwr-/edit?usp=share_link&ouid=111307342557889008106&rtpof=true&sd=true) - [RICE Template (Google Sheets)](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1S-6QpyOz5MCrV7B67LUWdZkAzn38Eahv/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=111307342557889008106&rtpof=true&sd=true) --- ### Further Reading - [The Product Management Frameworks Compendium + Templates](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/the-product-frameworks-compendium) - [Kano Model: How to Delight Your Customers Without Becoming a Feature Factory](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/kano-model-how-to-delight-your-customers) - [Continuous Product Discovery Masterclass (CPDM)](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/cpdm) (video course)
ROLES & RULES
- Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize problems (opportunities), not features.
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- markdown
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.72
- CLARITY
- 0.90
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.85
- REUSABILITY
- 0.55
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.75
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Add explicit placeholders (e.g., {{team_size}}, {{product_stage}}) to the templates section to improve reusability.
- Include a short usage instruction at the top specifying how an LLM should reference the guide when answering user queries.
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR AGENT
- Beachhead Market Segment Analyzeragentproduct
- UI/UX Design Intelligence Guideagentproduct
- Customer Journey Map Generatoragentproduct
- Agile User Stories Generator with 3Csagentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow Designeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow Designeragentproduct
- New Product Feature Ideationagentproduct
- Existing Product Trio Idea Brainstormeragentproduct
- Onboarding CRO Flow Designeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UI Design Token Manageragentproduct
- Product Requirements Document Drafteragentproduct
- JTBD Job Stories Generatoragentproduct
- Product Feature Backlog Prioritizeragentproduct
- Research Data User Persona Creatoragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow and Screen Designeragentproduct
- Turkish Car Valuation Platform Designeragentproduct
- Opportunity Solution Tree Product Discoveryagentproduct
- Product Launch Pre-Mortem Risk Analyzeragentproduct
- Niche Domain Intelligence Report Generatoragentproduct
- Impact Risk Assumption Prioritizeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Feedback Statesagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Feedback States Adderagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct