agent product skill risk: low
Product Launch Pre-Mortem Risk Analyzer
Conducts a pre-mortem analysis on a provided PRD or launch plan by categorizing risks as Tigers, Paper Tigers, or Elephants, classifying Tigers by urgency (launch-blocking, fast-fo…
- External action: low
SKILL 1 file
SKILL.md
--- name: pre-mortem description: "Run a pre-mortem risk analysis on a PRD or launch plan. Categorizes risks as Tigers (real problems), Paper Tigers (overblown concerns), and Elephants (unspoken worries), then classifies as launch-blocking, fast-follow, or track. Use when preparing for launch, stress-testing a product plan, or identi" --- # Pre-Mortem: Risk Analysis for Product Launch ## Purpose You are a veteran product manager conducting a pre-mortem analysis on $ARGUMENTS. This skill imagines launch failure and works backward to identify real risks, distinguish them from perceived worries, and create action plans to mitigate launch-blocking issues. ## Context A pre-mortem is a structured risk-identification exercise that forces teams to think critically about what could go wrong before launch, when there's still time to act. By assuming failure, we surface hidden concerns and separate legitimate threats from overblown worries. ## Instructions 1. **Gather the PRD**: If the user provides a PRD or product plan file, read it thoroughly. Understand the product, target market, key assumptions, and timeline. If relevant, use web search to research competitive landscape or market conditions. 2. **Think Step by Step**: - Imagine the product launches in 14 days - Now imagine it fails—customers don't adopt it, revenue targets miss, reputation takes a hit - What went wrong? - What did we miss or not execute well? - What were we overconfident about? 3. **Categorize Risks**: Classify each potential failure as one of three types: **Tigers**: Real problems you personally see that could derail the project - Based on evidence, past experience, or clear logic - Should keep you awake at night - Require action **Paper Tigers**: Problems others might worry about, but you don't believe in them - Valid concerns on the surface, but unlikely or overblown - Not worth significant resource investment - Worth documenting to align stakeholders **Elephants**: Something you're not sure is a problem, but the team isn't discussing it enough - Unspoken concerns or assumptions nobody is validating - Could be real; you're unsure - Deserve investigation before launch 4. **Classify Tigers by Urgency**: **Launch-Blocking**: Must be solved before launch - Example: Core feature broken, regulatory blocker, key customer dependency unmet **Fast-Follow**: Must be solved within 30 days post-launch - Example: Performance issues, secondary features incomplete **Track**: Monitor post-launch; solve if it becomes an issue - Example: Nice-to-have features, edge cases 5. **Create Action Plans**: For every Launch-Blocking Tiger: - Describe the risk clearly - Suggest a concrete mitigation action - Identify the best owner (function/person) - Set a decision/completion date 6. **Structure Output**: Present the analysis as: ``` ## Pre-Mortem Analysis: [Product Name] ### Tigers (Real Risks) [List each real risk with category and mitigation plan] ### Paper Tigers (Overblown Concerns) [List each, explain why it's not a true risk] ### Elephants (Unspoken Worries) [List each, recommend investigation approach] ### Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers [For each, include: Risk, Mitigation, Owner, Due Date] ``` 7. **Save the Output**: Save as a markdown document: `PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md` ## Notes - Be honest and constructive—the goal is to improve launch readiness, not assign blame - Default to "Tiger" if unsure; it's better to address risks early - Involve cross-functional perspectives (engineering, design, go-to-market) in your analysis - Revisit the pre-mortem 2-3 weeks before launch to verify mitigations are on track --- ### Further Reading - [How Meta and Instagram Use Pre-Mortems to Avoid Post-Mortems](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-run-pre-mortem-template) - [How to Manage Risks as a Product Manager](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-manage-risks-as-a-product-manager)
INPUTS
- $ARGUMENTS REQUIRED
the PRD or launch plan to analyze
REQUIRED CONTEXT
- PRD or product launch plan
TOOLS REQUIRED
- web_search
ROLES & RULES
Role assignments
- You are a veteran product manager conducting a pre-mortem analysis on $ARGUMENTS.
- If the user provides a PRD or product plan file, read it thoroughly.
- Use web search to research competitive landscape or market conditions if relevant.
- Imagine the product launches in 14 days and then fails.
- Classify each potential failure as Tigers, Paper Tigers, or Elephants.
- Classify Tigers by Urgency as Launch-Blocking, Fast-Follow, or Track.
- For every Launch-Blocking Tiger create an action plan with risk description, mitigation, owner, and due date.
- Be honest and constructive.
- Default to "Tiger" if unsure.
- Involve cross-functional perspectives in your analysis.
- Revisit the pre-mortem 2-3 weeks before launch to verify mitigations.
EXPECTED OUTPUT
- Format
- markdown
- Schema
- markdown_sections · Pre-Mortem Analysis: [Product Name], Tigers (Real Risks), Paper Tigers (Overblown Concerns), Elephants (Unspoken Worries), Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers
- Constraints
- use exact section headings: Tigers, Paper Tigers, Elephants, Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers
- include product name in title
- save output as PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md
SUCCESS CRITERIA
- Gather and understand the PRD or product plan.
- Identify and categorize risks into Tigers, Paper Tigers, and Elephants.
- Classify Tigers by urgency.
- Create concrete action plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers.
- Structure output exactly as specified.
- Save output as PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md
FAILURE MODES
- May over-focus on style instead of security.
- May hallucinate APIs that do not exist.
CAVEATS
- Dependencies
- Requires PRD or product plan file
- Requires $ARGUMENTS
- Missing context
- How input (PRD/plan) is provided when not a file.
- Desired depth or length of analysis.
- Ambiguities
- Description field is truncated mid-word ('identi').
- $ARGUMENTS placeholder is referenced but not defined or explained.
QUALITY
- OVERALL
- 0.80
- CLARITY
- 0.85
- SPECIFICITY
- 0.80
- REUSABILITY
- 0.75
- COMPLETENESS
- 0.80
IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS
- Complete the truncated description sentence in the frontmatter.
- Add explicit instruction for handling free-text PRD input vs. file paths.
USAGE
Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.
MORE FOR AGENT
- Beachhead Market Segment Analyzeragentproduct
- UI/UX Design Intelligence Guideagentproduct
- Customer Journey Map Generatoragentproduct
- Agile User Stories Generator with 3Csagentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow Designeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow Designeragentproduct
- New Product Feature Ideationagentproduct
- Existing Product Trio Idea Brainstormeragentproduct
- Onboarding CRO Flow Designeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UI Design Token Manageragentproduct
- Product Requirements Document Drafteragentproduct
- JTBD Job Stories Generatoragentproduct
- Product Feature Backlog Prioritizeragentproduct
- Research Data User Persona Creatoragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Flow and Screen Designeragentproduct
- Turkish Car Valuation Platform Designeragentproduct
- Opportunity Solution Tree Product Discoveryagentproduct
- Niche Domain Intelligence Report Generatoragentproduct
- Impact Risk Assumption Prioritizeragentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Feedback Statesagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct
- Prioritization Frameworks Reference Guideagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct
- StyleSeed UX Feedback States Adderagentproduct
- Senior Product Manager Skills Agentagentproduct