Skip to main content
NEW · APP STORE Now on iOS · macOS · iPad Android & Windows soon GET IT
Prompts Product Launch Pre-Mortem Risk Analyzer

agent product skill risk: low

Product Launch Pre-Mortem Risk Analyzer

Conducts a pre-mortem analysis on a provided PRD or launch plan by categorizing risks as Tigers, Paper Tigers, or Elephants, classifying Tigers by urgency (launch-blocking, fast-fo…

  • External action: low

SKILL 1 file

SKILL.md
---
name: pre-mortem
description: "Run a pre-mortem risk analysis on a PRD or launch plan. Categorizes risks as Tigers (real problems), Paper Tigers (overblown concerns), and Elephants (unspoken worries), then classifies as launch-blocking, fast-follow, or track. Use when preparing for launch, stress-testing a product plan, or identi"
---
# Pre-Mortem: Risk Analysis for Product Launch

## Purpose

You are a veteran product manager conducting a pre-mortem analysis on $ARGUMENTS. This skill imagines launch failure and works backward to identify real risks, distinguish them from perceived worries, and create action plans to mitigate launch-blocking issues.

## Context

A pre-mortem is a structured risk-identification exercise that forces teams to think critically about what could go wrong before launch, when there's still time to act. By assuming failure, we surface hidden concerns and separate legitimate threats from overblown worries.

## Instructions

1. **Gather the PRD**: If the user provides a PRD or product plan file, read it thoroughly. Understand the product, target market, key assumptions, and timeline. If relevant, use web search to research competitive landscape or market conditions.

2. **Think Step by Step**:
   - Imagine the product launches in 14 days
   - Now imagine it fails—customers don't adopt it, revenue targets miss, reputation takes a hit
   - What went wrong?
   - What did we miss or not execute well?
   - What were we overconfident about?

3. **Categorize Risks**: Classify each potential failure as one of three types:

   **Tigers**: Real problems you personally see that could derail the project
   - Based on evidence, past experience, or clear logic
   - Should keep you awake at night
   - Require action

   **Paper Tigers**: Problems others might worry about, but you don't believe in them
   - Valid concerns on the surface, but unlikely or overblown
   - Not worth significant resource investment
   - Worth documenting to align stakeholders

   **Elephants**: Something you're not sure is a problem, but the team isn't discussing it enough
   - Unspoken concerns or assumptions nobody is validating
   - Could be real; you're unsure
   - Deserve investigation before launch

4. **Classify Tigers by Urgency**:

   **Launch-Blocking**: Must be solved before launch
   - Example: Core feature broken, regulatory blocker, key customer dependency unmet

   **Fast-Follow**: Must be solved within 30 days post-launch
   - Example: Performance issues, secondary features incomplete

   **Track**: Monitor post-launch; solve if it becomes an issue
   - Example: Nice-to-have features, edge cases

5. **Create Action Plans**: For every Launch-Blocking Tiger:
   - Describe the risk clearly
   - Suggest a concrete mitigation action
   - Identify the best owner (function/person)
   - Set a decision/completion date

6. **Structure Output**: Present the analysis as:

   ```
   ## Pre-Mortem Analysis: [Product Name]

   ### Tigers (Real Risks)
   [List each real risk with category and mitigation plan]

   ### Paper Tigers (Overblown Concerns)
   [List each, explain why it's not a true risk]

   ### Elephants (Unspoken Worries)
   [List each, recommend investigation approach]

   ### Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers
   [For each, include: Risk, Mitigation, Owner, Due Date]
   ```

7. **Save the Output**: Save as a markdown document: `PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md`

## Notes

- Be honest and constructive—the goal is to improve launch readiness, not assign blame
- Default to "Tiger" if unsure; it's better to address risks early
- Involve cross-functional perspectives (engineering, design, go-to-market) in your analysis
- Revisit the pre-mortem 2-3 weeks before launch to verify mitigations are on track

---

### Further Reading

- [How Meta and Instagram Use Pre-Mortems to Avoid Post-Mortems](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-run-pre-mortem-template)
- [How to Manage Risks as a Product Manager](https://www.productcompass.pm/p/how-to-manage-risks-as-a-product-manager)

INPUTS

$ARGUMENTS REQUIRED

the PRD or launch plan to analyze

REQUIRED CONTEXT

  • PRD or product launch plan

TOOLS REQUIRED

  • web_search

ROLES & RULES

Role assignments

  • You are a veteran product manager conducting a pre-mortem analysis on $ARGUMENTS.
  1. If the user provides a PRD or product plan file, read it thoroughly.
  2. Use web search to research competitive landscape or market conditions if relevant.
  3. Imagine the product launches in 14 days and then fails.
  4. Classify each potential failure as Tigers, Paper Tigers, or Elephants.
  5. Classify Tigers by Urgency as Launch-Blocking, Fast-Follow, or Track.
  6. For every Launch-Blocking Tiger create an action plan with risk description, mitigation, owner, and due date.
  7. Be honest and constructive.
  8. Default to "Tiger" if unsure.
  9. Involve cross-functional perspectives in your analysis.
  10. Revisit the pre-mortem 2-3 weeks before launch to verify mitigations.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format
markdown
Schema
markdown_sections · Pre-Mortem Analysis: [Product Name], Tigers (Real Risks), Paper Tigers (Overblown Concerns), Elephants (Unspoken Worries), Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers
Constraints
  • use exact section headings: Tigers, Paper Tigers, Elephants, Action Plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers
  • include product name in title
  • save output as PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md

SUCCESS CRITERIA

  • Gather and understand the PRD or product plan.
  • Identify and categorize risks into Tigers, Paper Tigers, and Elephants.
  • Classify Tigers by urgency.
  • Create concrete action plans for Launch-Blocking Tigers.
  • Structure output exactly as specified.
  • Save output as PreMortem-[product-name]-[date].md

FAILURE MODES

  • May over-focus on style instead of security.
  • May hallucinate APIs that do not exist.

CAVEATS

Dependencies
  • Requires PRD or product plan file
  • Requires $ARGUMENTS
Missing context
  • How input (PRD/plan) is provided when not a file.
  • Desired depth or length of analysis.
Ambiguities
  • Description field is truncated mid-word ('identi').
  • $ARGUMENTS placeholder is referenced but not defined or explained.

QUALITY

OVERALL
0.80
CLARITY
0.85
SPECIFICITY
0.80
REUSABILITY
0.75
COMPLETENESS
0.80

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

  • Complete the truncated description sentence in the frontmatter.
  • Add explicit instruction for handling free-text PRD input vs. file paths.

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.

MORE FOR AGENT