analyst analysis template risk: low

Online Groups Values Behaviors Comparator

The prompt instructs the model to compare the values and behaviors of ${group_a} and ${group_b} in online spaces.

PROMPT

Compare the values and behaviors of ${group_a} and ${group_b} in online spaces.

INPUTS

group_a REQUIRED

First group to compare

e.g. Gen Z

group_b REQUIRED

Second group to compare

e.g. Boomers

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Format: plain_text

SUCCESS CRITERIA

Compare values of ${group_a} and ${group_b}
Compare behaviors of ${group_a} and ${group_b} in online spaces

FAILURE MODES

May produce biased or inaccurate group comparisons
Lacks guidance on sources or neutrality

CAVEATS

Dependencies

Requires definitions for ${group_a}
Requires definitions for ${group_b}

Missing context

Output format (e.g., table, essay, bullet points).
Criteria or examples for 'values' and 'behaviors'.
Time frame or specific platforms.
Sources of evidence (e.g., data, studies).

Ambiguities

Unclear what specific aspects of 'values and behaviors' to compare.
'Online spaces' is vague (e.g., social media, forums, specific platforms?).
No guidance on comparison structure or depth.

QUALITY

OVERALL: 0.60
CLARITY: 0.90
SPECIFICITY: 0.40
REUSABILITY: 0.90
COMPLETENESS: 0.30

IMPROVEMENT SUGGESTIONS

Add output format: 'Output as a markdown table with columns for Group A, Group B, and Differences.'
Specify aspects: 'Focus on political values, communication styles, and moderation interactions.'
Include constraints: 'Base on public data from Twitter/X and Reddit; limit to 5 key points per group.'

USAGE

Copy the prompt above and paste it into your AI of choice — Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or anywhere else you're working. Replace any placeholder sections with your own context, then ask for the output.